The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
incr(mark(X)) →⁺ mark(incr(X))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
The pumping substitution is [X / mark(X)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)